Filed: Jan. 11, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7488 WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES, INCOR- PORATED; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORREC- TIONS, Board Members, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-01-508-CT) Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 11, 2002 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7488 WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES, INCOR- PORATED; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORREC- TIONS, Board Members, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-01-508-CT) Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 11, 2002 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7488 WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES, INCOR- PORATED; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORREC- TIONS, Board Members, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-01-508-CT) Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 11, 2002 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wayne Thomas Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Wayne T. Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Servs., Inc., No. CA-01-508-CT (E.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 2001). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
