Filed: Mar. 14, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7852 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BYRON CARLTON CUMBER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-99-28, CA-00-154-7-F) Submitted: February 26, 2002 Decided: March 14, 2002 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Byro
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7852 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BYRON CARLTON CUMBER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-99-28, CA-00-154-7-F) Submitted: February 26, 2002 Decided: March 14, 2002 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Byron..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7852 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BYRON CARLTON CUMBER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-99-28, CA-00-154-7-F) Submitted: February 26, 2002 Decided: March 14, 2002 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Byron Carlton Cumber, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Byron Cumber seeks to appeal the district court’s order de- nying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Cumber’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea- soning of the district court. United States v. Cumber, Nos. CR-99- 28; CA-00-154-7-F (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 28, 2001; entered Aug. 29, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
