UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7926 EUGENE R. DANIELS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER NEAL; NFN SEWELL; MAJOR RILEY; WARDEN JOHNSON; NFN MULLENAX; NURSE BEIFIELT; DOCTOR EDWARDS; NFN MONTGOMERY; D. SBYANT; NFN MAST; NFN HAMILTON; NURSE CROCKER; NFN WILLIAMS; NFN MCGREW; BOBO; CAPTAIN MILLER; NFN WADE; NFN SMITH; NFN ISGRIGG; NFN ULTMAN; MALE NURSE GREEN; LIEUTENANT HART; NFN KUMINSKY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-99-4084-7) Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene R. Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Vinton DeVane Lide, VINTON D. LIDE & ASSOCIATES, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Eugene R. Daniels appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Daniels v. Neal, No. CA-99-4084-7 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 19, 2001 & entered Oct. 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2