Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Borda, 01-8049 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-8049 Visitors: 197
Filed: May 29, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-8049 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSE HERNAN BORDA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-267-AW, CA-00-1527-AW) Submitted: April 9, 2002 Decided: May 29, 2002 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jose Hernan Borda, Appe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-8049 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSE HERNAN BORDA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-267-AW, CA-00-1527-AW) Submitted: April 9, 2002 Decided: May 29, 2002 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jose Hernan Borda, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Jose Hernan Borda seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001), his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion as to that order, and his motion for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Borda, Nos. CR-95-267-AW; CA-00-1527-AW (D. Md. Aug. 28, Sept. 6, and Nov. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer