Filed: Apr. 30, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1071 WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SPRING GROVE HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-01-2702-DKC) Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Allen Legg, Appellant Pro Se.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1071 WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SPRING GROVE HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-01-2702-DKC) Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Allen Legg, Appellant Pro Se. U..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1071
WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SPRING GROVE HOSPITAL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
(CA-01-2702-DKC)
Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Allen Legg, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
William Allen Legg seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Legg’s notice
of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the
district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal
period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is
“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of
Corrections,
434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.
Robinson,
361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on
September 25, 2001. Legg’s notice of appeal was filed on December
27, 2001. Because Legg failed to file a timely notice of appeal or
to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we
dismiss the appeal. We deny Legg’s motions for discovery and for
general relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2