Filed: Aug. 19, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1180 FRANCIS PIERRE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Office of the Attorney General; ARLINGTON COUNTY GENERAL DISTRICT COURT, The Judges and the Clerk’s Office; WASHINGTON SHUTTLE, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-02-71-A) Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: A
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1180 FRANCIS PIERRE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Office of the Attorney General; ARLINGTON COUNTY GENERAL DISTRICT COURT, The Judges and the Clerk’s Office; WASHINGTON SHUTTLE, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-02-71-A) Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: Au..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1180 FRANCIS PIERRE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Office of the Attorney General; ARLINGTON COUNTY GENERAL DISTRICT COURT, The Judges and the Clerk’s Office; WASHINGTON SHUTTLE, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-02-71-A) Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 19, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Francis Pierre, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Francis Pierre appeals the district court’s order dismissing his attempt to appeal his state action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pierre v. Virginia, No. CA-02-71-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
