Filed: Jul. 31, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1280 ARLENE J. HOFFMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES E. OESTERREICHER, President of J.C. Penney Company, Incorporated; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-01-1532-A) Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002 Befo
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1280 ARLENE J. HOFFMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES E. OESTERREICHER, President of J.C. Penney Company, Incorporated; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-01-1532-A) Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002 Befor..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1280 ARLENE J. HOFFMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES E. OESTERREICHER, President of J.C. Penney Company, Incorporated; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-01-1532-A) Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arlene J. Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se. Celeste deLorge Flippen, J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Plano, Texas; Claude David Convisser, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Arlene J. Hoffman appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hoffman v. Oesterreicher, No. CA-01-1532-A (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 7, 2002 & entered Feb. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2