Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bolden v. Massanari, Acting, 02-1356 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-1356 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 10, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1356 RONNIE N. BOLDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LARRY G. MASSANARI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-48-2) Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: July 10, 2002 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpubli
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1356 RONNIE N. BOLDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LARRY G. MASSANARI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-48-2) Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: July 10, 2002 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie N. Bolden, Appellant Pro Se. Connie Hoffman-Healy, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Ronnie N. Bolden appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security in his action for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bolden v. Massanari, No. CA-01-48-2 (W.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer