Filed: Aug. 19, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1632 JAMES KISSEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CA-01-58-4) Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 19, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Kissee, Appellant
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1632 JAMES KISSEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CA-01-58-4) Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 19, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Kissee, Appellant P..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1632
JAMES KISSEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge.
(CA-01-58-4)
Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 19, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Kissee, Appellant Pro Se. James J. Vergara, Jr., VERGARA &
ASSOCIATES, Hopewell, Virginia; Mark H. Reynolds, BUTSAVAGE &
ASSOCIATES, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James Kissee appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his employment discrimination action under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-
2(c) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Kissee v. United Food & Commercial
Workers Union, No. CA-01-58-4 (W.D. Va. May 8, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2