Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Meredith v. Stovall, 02-1652 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-1652 Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 19, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1652 GEORGE MINOR MEREDITH, II, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CARLA STOVALL, in her personal capacity; KELLI BENINTENDI, Esq.; JOHN W. KNACK, in his personal capacity; KENNETH SCHEINBERG, in his personal capacity; JANE HOLT; VICKY JONES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-02-192-2) Submitted: Aug
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1652 GEORGE MINOR MEREDITH, II, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CARLA STOVALL, in her personal capacity; KELLI BENINTENDI, Esq.; JOHN W. KNACK, in his personal capacity; KENNETH SCHEINBERG, in his personal capacity; JANE HOLT; VICKY JONES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-02-192-2) Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 19, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Minor Meredith, II, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Joshua Cromwell, Brian Andrew Wainger, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: George Minor Meredith, II, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of personal jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Meredith v. Stovall, No. CA-02-192-2 (E.D. Va. June 10, 2002). We deny the Appellees’ motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer