Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Arseneault v. Prince William Cnty, 02-1793 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-1793 Visitors: 22
Filed: Nov. 26, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1793 PETER ARSENEAULT, a minor by his parents and next friends Joseph and Jane Arseneault, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-01-725-A) Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 26, 2002 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1793 PETER ARSENEAULT, a minor by his parents and next friends Joseph and Jane Arseneault, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-01-725-A) Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 26, 2002 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter Arseneault, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Ellen McGowan, SICILIANO, ELLIS, DYER & BOCCAROSSE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Peter Arseneault, by his next friends and parents, Joseph and Jane Arseneault, appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Prince William County School Board on his claim that the School Board denied him a free appropriate public education in violation of the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1487 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Arseneault v. Prince William County Sch. Bd. No. CA-01-725-A (E.D. Va. June 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer