Filed: Nov. 27, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1953 VENNA L. SPENCER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MORNINGSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT; TOWN OF MORNINGSIDE, MD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 01-3746-PJM) Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: November 27, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opini
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1953 VENNA L. SPENCER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MORNINGSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT; TOWN OF MORNINGSIDE, MD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 01-3746-PJM) Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: November 27, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1953 VENNA L. SPENCER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MORNINGSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT; TOWN OF MORNINGSIDE, MD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 01-3746-PJM) Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: November 27, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Venna L. Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Karp, ALLEN, KARPINSKI, BRYANT & KARP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Venna Spencer appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Spencer v. Morningside Police Dep’t, No. CA- 01-3746-PJM (D. Md. July 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
