Filed: Mar. 27, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6127 JESSIE BENJAMIN KINDLEY, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH RANSON; ROBERT W. WALKER, Magistrate; RON ANGELONE, Executive Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-844-2) Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 27, 2002 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Se
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6127 JESSIE BENJAMIN KINDLEY, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH RANSON; ROBERT W. WALKER, Magistrate; RON ANGELONE, Executive Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-844-2) Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 27, 2002 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Sen..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6127
JESSIE BENJAMIN KINDLEY, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KENNETH RANSON; ROBERT W. WALKER, Magistrate;
RON ANGELONE, Executive Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (CA-01-844-2)
Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 27, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jessie Benjamin Kindley, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jessie Benjamin Kindley, Sr., a Virginia inmate, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983
(West Supp. 2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.
2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
Kindley v. Ranson, No. CA-01-844-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2001); see
also Linda R.S. v. Richard D.,
410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973) (noting
that a private citizen has no enforceable right to institute a
criminal prosecution). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2