Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Choice v. Blackwell, 02-6604 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-6604 Visitors: 47
Filed: Jun. 19, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6604 KEVIN L. CHOICE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DANNY R. BLACKWELL, Physician II, Kershaw Correctional Institution, in his individual capacity; DORIS ANN COOK, Nurse Administrator, KCI, in her individual capacity; MICHELLE M. USSERY, R.N., KCI, in her individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6604 KEVIN L. CHOICE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DANNY R. BLACKWELL, Physician II, Kershaw Correctional Institution, in his individual capacity; DORIS ANN COOK, Nurse Administrator, KCI, in her individual capacity; MICHELLE M. USSERY, R.N., KCI, in her individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-01-1931-0-25BD) Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 19, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin L. Choice, Appellant Pro Se. John Eric Fulda, Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Kevin L. Choice appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Choice v. Blackwell, No. CA-01-1931-0-25BD (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer