Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cole v. Saunders, 02-6608 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-6608 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 06, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6608 MARK WILLIAM COLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LONNIE M. SAUNDERS, Warden, Augusta Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-395-7) Submitted: August 27, 2002 Decided: September 6, 2002 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opini
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6608 MARK WILLIAM COLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LONNIE M. SAUNDERS, Warden, Augusta Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-395-7) Submitted: August 27, 2002 Decided: September 6, 2002 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Bernard Hargett, HARGETT & WATSON, P.L.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Mark William Cole seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Cole has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Cole v. Saunders, No. CA-01-395-7 (W.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer