Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tensley-Bey v. Commonwealth of VA, 02-6636 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-6636 Visitors: 28
Filed: Sep. 19, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6636 BERNARD A. TENSLEY-BEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR ULEP; JO ANN MCCARTHY, Defendants - Appellees, and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MEDICAL HEALTH SERVICES, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-1449-AM) Submitted: August 16, 2002 Decided: September 19, 2002
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6636 BERNARD A. TENSLEY-BEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR ULEP; JO ANN MCCARTHY, Defendants - Appellees, and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MEDICAL HEALTH SERVICES, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-1449-AM) Submitted: August 16, 2002 Decided: September 19, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernard A. Tensley-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. John David McChesney, Coreen Antoinette Bromfield, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Bernard A. Tensley-Bey appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tensley-Bey v. Virginia, No. CA-00-1449-AM (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 27, 2000, entered Nov. 28, 2000; filed Apr. 9, 2002, entered Apr. 10, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer