Filed: Dec. 02, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7231 RICHARD LEWIS BECKWITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA GIROUX; KLIMKIEWICZ, Physician’s Assistant; DOCTOR MOUBAREK, Clinical Director; ISAM ELYAN; DAWN WILLIAMS, R.N.; JODY AMEZCUA, R.N.; LISA DUDEK, R.N.; JANE DOE(s), #1-25; JOHN DOE(s), #1-25, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-1799) S
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7231 RICHARD LEWIS BECKWITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA GIROUX; KLIMKIEWICZ, Physician’s Assistant; DOCTOR MOUBAREK, Clinical Director; ISAM ELYAN; DAWN WILLIAMS, R.N.; JODY AMEZCUA, R.N.; LISA DUDEK, R.N.; JANE DOE(s), #1-25; JOHN DOE(s), #1-25, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-1799) Su..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7231
RICHARD LEWIS BECKWITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VIRGINIA GIROUX; KLIMKIEWICZ, Physician’s
Assistant; DOCTOR MOUBAREK, Clinical Director;
ISAM ELYAN; DAWN WILLIAMS, R.N.; JODY AMEZCUA,
R.N.; LISA DUDEK, R.N.; JANE DOE(s), #1-25;
JOHN DOE(s), #1-25,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-02-1799)
Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: December 2, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Lewis Beckwith, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Richard Lewis Beckwith appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint alleging claims under Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388
(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court that
Beckwith has not exhausted administrative remedies with respect to
his Bivens claims.* See Beckwith v. Giroux, No. CA-02-1799 (D. Md.
filed Aug. 8, 2002 & entered Aug. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Beckwith abandoned his remaining claims on appeal. See 4th
Cir. R. 34(b).
2