Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Works Council v. US Dept of Air Force, 00-1123 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1123
Filed: Oct. 08, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1123 WORKS COUNCIL (BETRIEBSVERTRETUNG) 86 CEG; FRITZ FRANK; BERND GUCKENBIEHL; MANFRED KRAUS; KURT MATHEIS; HORST-WALTER NEU; WOLFGANG SIEGFRIED; KARL-HEINZ STASS; R&W FLAMMANN GMBH, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; DR. JAMES G. ROCHE, SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, Defendants - Appellees, and WORLD SERVICE ALLIANCE, GMBH, Intervenor/Defendant. Appeal from the United States District C
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1123 WORKS COUNCIL (BETRIEBSVERTRETUNG) 86 CEG; FRITZ FRANK; BERND GUCKENBIEHL; MANFRED KRAUS; KURT MATHEIS; HORST-WALTER NEU; WOLFGANG SIEGFRIED; KARL-HEINZ STASS; R&W FLAMMANN GMBH, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; DR. JAMES G. ROCHE, SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, Defendants - Appellees, and WORLD SERVICE ALLIANCE, GMBH, Intervenor/Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-99-1522-A) Argued: September 23, 2003 Decided: October 8, 2003 Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. ARGUED: David Samuel Panzer, GREENBERG TRAURIG, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Steven E. Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Jon W. Van Horne, Eric C. Rowe, Geoffrey J. Greeves, GREENBERG TRAURIG, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Mark David Maxwell, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: We have considered the record and the briefs and, upon oral argument, are of opinion there is no reversible error in this case. The judgment of the district court is accordingly AFFIRMED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer