Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Washington v. Hampton Roads, 02-1713 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-1713 Visitors: 46
Filed: Mar. 12, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1713 JULIO R. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HAMPTON ROADS SHIPPING ASSOCIATION; ILA LOCAL 1248; ILA LOCAL 970; ILA SENIORITY BOARD; MANAGEMENT/ILA SENIORITY COMMITTEE; HAMPTON ROADS SHIPPING ASSOCIATION/ILA CONTRACT BOARD; HAMPTON ROADS DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL INDUSTRY GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE, Defendants - Appellees, LEE BOOTHBY, Movant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virgini
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1713 JULIO R. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HAMPTON ROADS SHIPPING ASSOCIATION; ILA LOCAL 1248; ILA LOCAL 970; ILA SENIORITY BOARD; MANAGEMENT/ILA SENIORITY COMMITTEE; HAMPTON ROADS SHIPPING ASSOCIATION/ILA CONTRACT BOARD; HAMPTON ROADS DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL INDUSTRY GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE, Defendants - Appellees, LEE BOOTHBY, Movant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-880-2) Submitted: January 27, 2003 Decided: March 12, 2003 Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas R. Knoll, Sr., Staunton, Virginia; Lee Boothby, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Dean T. Buckius, Christopher Ambrosio, VANDEVENTER BLACK, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia; Deborah C. Waters, RUTTER, WALSH, MILLS, & RUTTER, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia; Charles S. Montagna, MONTAGNA, BREIT, KLEIN, CAMDEN, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Julio Washington appeals the district court’s judgment granting summary judgment to the defendants and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Washington v. Hampton Roads, CA-01-880-2 (E.D. Va. May 31, 2002). Having granted the motion to submit the case on briefs, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conclusions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer