Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bethea v. Southeastern Reg Med, 02-1751 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-1751 Visitors: 13
Filed: May 02, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1751 MAURICE BETHEA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTHEASTERN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, a/k/a Robeson County Memorial Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Baker-Thompson Memorial Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Southeastern General Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Incorporated; BRUCE B. BERGSTRESSER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of N
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1751 MAURICE BETHEA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTHEASTERN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, a/k/a Robeson County Memorial Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Baker-Thompson Memorial Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Southeastern General Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Incorporated; BRUCE B. BERGSTRESSER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-62-7-F) Submitted: April 16, 2003 Decided: May 2, 2003 Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel F. Read, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. James Bernard Spears, Jr., Jerry Howard Walters, Jr., HAYNSWORTH, BALDWIN, JOHNSON & GREAVES, L.L.C., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Maurice Bethea appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants, thereby dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bethea v. Southeastern Regional Medical Center, No. CA-01-62-7-F (E.D.N.C. June 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer