Filed: May 13, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2325 DIANA M. CAMPITELLI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS L. OSBORNE; MARJORIE D. NESBITT, Administrator, Human Resources; E. KENNEDY, President, Kennedy Personnel Services; STEPHEN KENNEDY; GISELE M. MATHEWS, Assistant Attorney General, Maryland Department of Transportation; ROGER D. FORD, Defendants - Appellees, and PARRIS N. GLENDENING, Governor, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distri
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2325 DIANA M. CAMPITELLI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS L. OSBORNE; MARJORIE D. NESBITT, Administrator, Human Resources; E. KENNEDY, President, Kennedy Personnel Services; STEPHEN KENNEDY; GISELE M. MATHEWS, Assistant Attorney General, Maryland Department of Transportation; ROGER D. FORD, Defendants - Appellees, and PARRIS N. GLENDENING, Governor, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distric..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2325 DIANA M. CAMPITELLI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS L. OSBORNE; MARJORIE D. NESBITT, Administrator, Human Resources; E. KENNEDY, President, Kennedy Personnel Services; STEPHEN KENNEDY; GISELE M. MATHEWS, Assistant Attorney General, Maryland Department of Transportation; ROGER D. FORD, Defendants - Appellees, and PARRIS N. GLENDENING, Governor, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-2796-L) Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 13, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Diana M. Campitelli, Appellant Pro Se. John Charles Bell, MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Diana M. Campitelli appeals from the district court’s order denying relief in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Campitelli’s motion to adopt her motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed in a prior appeal, we deny her motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Campitelli v. Glendening, No. CA-00-2796-L (D. Md. Sept. 23, 2002). We also deny Campitelli’s motions for default judgment and to expedite the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2