Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lewis v. Boucher, 02-2466 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-2466 Visitors: 21
Filed: Sep. 08, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2466 WILBERT WESLEY LEWIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W. G. BOUCHER, personally and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Roanoke, Defendant - Appellee, and CITY OF ROANOKE; ATLAS GASKINS, personally and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Roanoke, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chi
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2466 WILBERT WESLEY LEWIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W. G. BOUCHER, personally and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Roanoke, Defendant - Appellee, and CITY OF ROANOKE; ATLAS GASKINS, personally and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Roanoke, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-566-7) Submitted: July 22, 2003 Decided: September 8, 2003 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilbert Wesley Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Roanoke, Virginia; Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., GUYNN & MEMMER, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Wilbert Wesley Lewis appeals the district court’s order denying relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action, pursuant to the jury’s verdict. Lewis has not provided a transcript, and he fails to establish a basis to have a transcript prepared at government expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2000). We have reviewed the existing record and find no basis for appellate relief. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Lewis v. Boucher, No. CA-00-566-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer