Filed: Mar. 26, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7135 EDWIN CRUZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNNAMED DEFENDANTS; M. HARRISON, Correctional Officer, Red Onion State Prison; W. FULLER, Correctional Officer, Red Onion State Prison; J. SYKES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-95-7) Submitted: March 12, 2003 Decided: March 26, 2003 Before WIDENER
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7135 EDWIN CRUZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNNAMED DEFENDANTS; M. HARRISON, Correctional Officer, Red Onion State Prison; W. FULLER, Correctional Officer, Red Onion State Prison; J. SYKES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-95-7) Submitted: March 12, 2003 Decided: March 26, 2003 Before WIDENER ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7135 EDWIN CRUZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNNAMED DEFENDANTS; M. HARRISON, Correctional Officer, Red Onion State Prison; W. FULLER, Correctional Officer, Red Onion State Prison; J. SYKES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-95-7) Submitted: March 12, 2003 Decided: March 26, 2003 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edwin Cruz, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Edwin Cruz appeals the district court’s order entering judgment pursuant to the jury’s verdict. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cruz v. Unnamed Defendants, No. CA-01-95-7 (W.D. Va. June 21, 2002). We deny Cruz’s motion for transfer to another correctional facility. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2