Filed: Jun. 06, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7337 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EMMITT LENROY ELLIS, JR., a/k/a Plucka, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge; Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-00-295-A, CA-01-1889-AM) Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 6, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judg
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7337 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EMMITT LENROY ELLIS, JR., a/k/a Plucka, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge; Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-00-295-A, CA-01-1889-AM) Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 6, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judge..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7337
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EMMITT LENROY ELLIS, JR., a/k/a Plucka,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge; Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-00-295-A,
CA-01-1889-AM)
Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 6, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Owaiian Maurice Jones, LAW OFFICES OF OWAIIAN M. JONES,
Fredericksburg, Virginia, for Appellant. Kimberly Riley Pederson,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Emmitt Lenroy Ellis seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be
taken from the final order in a motion under § 2255 unless a
circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not
issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent
“a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have independently reviewed the
record and conclude Ellis has not made the requisite showing. See
Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. ,
123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003).
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal. We deny Ellis’ motion for an evidentiary hearing. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2