Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sobin v. Hise, 02-7656 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-7656 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 13, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7656 DENNIS SOBIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH BROOKS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee, and CURTIS HISE; ROBERT ALEXANDER; PRISON STAFF MEMBERS, Known and Unknown, Respondents. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-54-AM) Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 13, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circ
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7656 DENNIS SOBIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH BROOKS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee, and CURTIS HISE; ROBERT ALEXANDER; PRISON STAFF MEMBERS, Known and Unknown, Respondents. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-54-AM) Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 13, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis Sobin, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Celia Ballow, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Dennis Sobin appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sobin v. Brooks, No. CA- 01-54-AM (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 4, 2002, entered Sept. 5, 2002; filed Oct. 15, 2002, entered Oct. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer