Filed: Mar. 13, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7745 JOSHUA BERNARD JOHNS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. SMITH, Record for Bed Assignment; MR. SCOTT, Security Officer Captain, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-01-1270-AM) Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 13, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpubli
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7745 JOSHUA BERNARD JOHNS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. SMITH, Record for Bed Assignment; MR. SCOTT, Security Officer Captain, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-01-1270-AM) Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 13, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublis..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7745 JOSHUA BERNARD JOHNS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. SMITH, Record for Bed Assignment; MR. SCOTT, Security Officer Captain, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-01-1270-AM) Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 13, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joshua Bernard Johns, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Joshua Bernard Johns appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), for failure to pay the partial filing fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johns v. Smith, No. CA-01-1270-AM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 28, 2002; entered Oct. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
