Filed: Mar. 14, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7923 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIE TYRON WHITE, a/k/a Ty, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CR-01-27) Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 14, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinon. Willie Tyron White, Appellant
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7923 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIE TYRON WHITE, a/k/a Ty, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CR-01-27) Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 14, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinon. Willie Tyron White, Appellant P..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7923 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIE TYRON WHITE, a/k/a Ty, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CR-01-27) Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 14, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinon. Willie Tyron White, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Willie Tyron White appeals the district court’s order denying his “Petition for Court Review of a Plea Promise to File a 5K1.1 Motion.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. White, No. CR-01-27 (W.D. Va. Dec. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
