Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Henson v. Commissioner SSA, 03-1297 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-1297 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 03, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1297 GEORGE HENSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-99-524) Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 3, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Hens
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1297 GEORGE HENSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-99-524) Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 3, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Henson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Eileen Alice Farmer, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: George Henson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of disability benefits for a period from 1993 to 1998. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Henson v. Commissioner of the Social Sec. Admin., No. CA-99-524 (E.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer