Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

El v. Lucent Technology, 03-1466 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-1466 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 24, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1466 AUBREY J. EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-627-3) Submitted: June 19, 2003 Decided: June 24, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aubrey J. El, Appellant
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1466 AUBREY J. EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-627-3) Submitted: June 19, 2003 Decided: June 24, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aubrey J. El, Appellant Pro Se. James LeRoy Banks, Jr., MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., McLean, Virginia; Christopher Michael Michalik, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Aubrey J. El appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment for Lucent Technologies, Inc., in his employment discrimination action and denying El’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See El v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., No. CA-02-627-3 (E.D. Va. March 6, 2003; March 21, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer