Filed: Oct. 16, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1618 KURT KASLER; LAURA KASLER, The People of North Carolina, ex rel, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus CAROL HOWARD, Commissioner of Division of Motor Vehicles, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CA-03-46-3) Submitted: October 9, 2003 Decided: October 16,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1618 KURT KASLER; LAURA KASLER, The People of North Carolina, ex rel, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus CAROL HOWARD, Commissioner of Division of Motor Vehicles, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CA-03-46-3) Submitted: October 9, 2003 Decided: October 16, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1618 KURT KASLER; LAURA KASLER, The People of North Carolina, ex rel, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus CAROL HOWARD, Commissioner of Division of Motor Vehicles, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CA-03-46-3) Submitted: October 9, 2003 Decided: October 16, 2003 Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kurt Kasler, Laura Kasler, Appellants Pro Se. Jeffrey Reid Edwards, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Kurt and Laura Kasler appeal the district court’s judgment granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismissing their complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kasler v. Howard, No. CA-03-46-3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2