Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Culver v. Musika, 03-1812 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-1812 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 23, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1812 In Re: WILLIAM H. ARNOLD, Debtor. ALLAN J. CULVER, JR., Appellant, versus TERRY L. MUSIKA, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03- 476-AMD, BK-93-55035-JFS) Submitted: November 26, 2003 Decided: December 23, 2003 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. All
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1812 In Re: WILLIAM H. ARNOLD, Debtor. ALLAN J. CULVER, JR., Appellant, versus TERRY L. MUSIKA, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03- 476-AMD, BK-93-55035-JFS) Submitted: November 26, 2003 Decided: December 23, 2003 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allan J. Culver, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Leo Wasserman, Darek S. Bushnaq, VENABLE, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Allan J. Culver, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order: (1) dismissing as untimely his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion for appointment as counsel to the debtor in the underlying bankruptcy proceeding; and (2) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion for allowance of counsel fees. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Culver v. Musika, Nos. CA-03-476-AMD; BK-93-55035-JFS (D. Md. May 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer