Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Agwumezie v. Allstate Insurance, 03-1846 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-1846 Visitors: 38
Filed: Sep. 03, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1846 ANTHONY A. AGWUMEZIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge; Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge. (CA-02-493-DKC) Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 3, 2003 Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1846 ANTHONY A. AGWUMEZIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge; Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge. (CA-02-493-DKC) Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 3, 2003 Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony A. Agwumezie, Appellant Pro Se. Craig David Roswell, Jeanie Lynn Scherrer, NILES, BARTON & WILMER, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Anthony A. Agwumezie appeals the district court’s order granting in part Allstate Insurance Company’s motion to dismiss and the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for new trial following a jury trial in his civil action against Allstate. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court and the magistrate judge. See Agwumezie v. Allstate Insurance, No. CA-02- 493-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 8, 2002; June 9, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer