Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Winstead v. Beck, 03-6000 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-6000 Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 27, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6000 RONALD BLAIR WINSTEAD, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THEODIS BECK, Secretary, NCDOC, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-842-5-BO) Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 27, 2003 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublishe
More
                              UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                              No. 03-6000



RONALD BLAIR WINSTEAD,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus


THEODIS BECK, Secretary, NCDOC,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-842-5-BO)


Submitted:   March 20, 2003                 Decided:   March 27, 2003


Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.


Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Ronald Blair Winstead, Appellant Pro Se. Roy Cooper, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ronald Blair Winstead seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Winstead has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell,     U.S.      , 
2003 WL 431659
, at *10 (U.S. Feb. 25, 2003) (No. 01-7662). Accordingly,

we deny Winstead’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny a

certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.




                                                            DISMISSED




                                2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer