Filed: May 02, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6092 WAYNE D. GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. SACCHET, Warden; SERGEANT TEACH; L. INGRAM, Corrections Officer; R. MILLS, Corrections Officer; L. WATERS, Warden, Maryland Correctional Institute-Hagerstown, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1835) Submitted: April 15, 2003 Decided: May 2, 2
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6092 WAYNE D. GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. SACCHET, Warden; SERGEANT TEACH; L. INGRAM, Corrections Officer; R. MILLS, Corrections Officer; L. WATERS, Warden, Maryland Correctional Institute-Hagerstown, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1835) Submitted: April 15, 2003 Decided: May 2, 20..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6092 WAYNE D. GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. SACCHET, Warden; SERGEANT TEACH; L. INGRAM, Corrections Officer; R. MILLS, Corrections Officer; L. WATERS, Warden, Maryland Correctional Institute-Hagerstown, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1835) Submitted: April 15, 2003 Decided: May 2, 2003 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wayne D. Green, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Wayne D. Green appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Sacchet, No. CA- 02-1835 (D. Md. filed Dec. 10, 2002; entered Dec. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2