Filed: Jun. 19, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6096 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PHILLIP HENRY CABBAGE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CR-99-17, CA-01-112) Submitted: May 20, 2003 Decided: June 19, 2003 Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. P
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6096 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PHILLIP HENRY CABBAGE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CR-99-17, CA-01-112) Submitted: May 20, 2003 Decided: June 19, 2003 Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ph..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6096
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PHILLIP HENRY CABBAGE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge.
(CR-99-17, CA-01-112)
Submitted: May 20, 2003 Decided: June 19, 2003
Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Henry Cabbage, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Phillip Henry Cabbage seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(2000). An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final
order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or
judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)
(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims
addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial
showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(2) (2000).
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Cabbage has not satisfied this standard. See Miller-El v. Cockrell,
U.S. ,
123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny
Cabbage’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal. We grant his motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis
and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2