Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kollyns v. Maynard, 03-6223 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-6223 Visitors: 28
Filed: Apr. 01, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6223 KRISTOPHER S. KOLLYNS, a/k/a Johnnie W. Todd, a/k/a John Wayne Todd, a/k/a Kris Sarayn Kollyns, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GARY MAYNARD, in official and personal capacities; PAULA WOODLEAF, in official and personal capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-01-4380-3) Submitted: M
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6223 KRISTOPHER S. KOLLYNS, a/k/a Johnnie W. Todd, a/k/a John Wayne Todd, a/k/a Kris Sarayn Kollyns, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GARY MAYNARD, in official and personal capacities; PAULA WOODLEAF, in official and personal capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-01-4380-3) Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: April 1, 2003 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kristopher S. Kollyns, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Brice McKeown, Jr., SPRATT, MCKEOWN & MCCRAE, York, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Kristopher S. Kollyns appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kollyns v. Maynard, No. CA-01-4380-3 (D.S.C. filed Jan. 21, 2003 & entered Jan. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer