Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Meyer v. Miro, 03-6383 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-6383
Filed: Jul. 23, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6383 MARK MEYER, a/k/a #219195, a/k/a “Supreme” Outspoken “7 Allah,” Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GERALDINE MIRO, Ex-Warden for Allendale Correctional Institution; JOHN PATE, Warden, Allendale Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-01-4260-4-25-BH) Submitted: July 11, 2003 Decided: J
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6383 MARK MEYER, a/k/a #219195, a/k/a “Supreme” Outspoken “7 Allah,” Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GERALDINE MIRO, Ex-Warden for Allendale Correctional Institution; JOHN PATE, Warden, Allendale Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-01-4260-4-25-BH) Submitted: July 11, 2003 Decided: July 23, 2003 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Meyer, Appellant Pro Se. Paul B. Ferrara, III, Robert Douglas Simmons Mellard, BOGOSLOW, JONES, STEPHENS & DUFFIE, P.A., Walterboro, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Mark Meyer appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Meyer v. Miro, No. CA-01-4260-4- 25-BH (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer