Filed: Jun. 05, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6487 TYRONE L. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNNAMED PHYSICIAN'S ASSISTANTS; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; BARRY STANTON, Director, Department of Corrections for Prince George's County, Maryland, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 00-431-DKC) Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 5,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6487 TYRONE L. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNNAMED PHYSICIAN'S ASSISTANTS; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; BARRY STANTON, Director, Department of Corrections for Prince George's County, Maryland, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 00-431-DKC) Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 5, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6487 TYRONE L. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNNAMED PHYSICIAN'S ASSISTANTS; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; BARRY STANTON, Director, Department of Corrections for Prince George's County, Maryland, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 00-431-DKC) Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 5, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opininion. Tyrone L. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, George Eugene Brown, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Tyrone L. Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Unnamed Physicians, No. CA-00-431-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2