Filed: Jul. 23, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6578 RICARDO ANTONIO DE LOS SANTOS-MORA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution, Cumberland, Respondent - Appellee. No. 03-6579 RICARDO ANTONIO DE LOS SANTOS-MORA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judg
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6578 RICARDO ANTONIO DE LOS SANTOS-MORA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution, Cumberland, Respondent - Appellee. No. 03-6579 RICARDO ANTONIO DE LOS SANTOS-MORA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6578 RICARDO ANTONIO DE LOS SANTOS-MORA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution, Cumberland, Respondent - Appellee. No. 03-6579 RICARDO ANTONIO DE LOS SANTOS-MORA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-118-2, CA-03-119-2) Submitted: June 26, 2003 Decided: July 23, 2003 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricardo Antonio De Los Santos-Mora, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Ricardo Antonio De Los Santos-Mora, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders concluding that he was entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See De Los Santos-Mora v. Warden, Nos. CA-03-118-2; CA-03-119-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2