Filed: Jun. 20, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6632 DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STUART O. SIMMS, Secretary, D.P.S.C.S.; CAPTAIN NEDER; STEVEN EDWARD ROACH; JEFF NIMES; DAVID LANCASTER, Lieutenant; STEVE ZOLLNER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 02-3647-PJM) Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 20, 2003 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6632 DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STUART O. SIMMS, Secretary, D.P.S.C.S.; CAPTAIN NEDER; STEVEN EDWARD ROACH; JEFF NIMES; DAVID LANCASTER, Lieutenant; STEVE ZOLLNER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 02-3647-PJM) Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 20, 2003 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6632
DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STUART O. SIMMS, Secretary, D.P.S.C.S.;
CAPTAIN NEDER; STEVEN EDWARD ROACH; JEFF
NIMES; DAVID LANCASTER, Lieutenant; STEVE
ZOLLNER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
02-3647-PJM)
Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 20, 2003
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. Gloria Wilson Shelton,
Joseph Frances Curran, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Demetric Gray Pearson seeks to appeal a district court order
requiring him to assist the court in effecting service of process.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order
Pearson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2