Filed: Jul. 15, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6673 CHARLES MILLARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ARCANGELO M. TUMINELLI, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-970-8-AW) Submitted: June 25, 2003 Decided: July 15, 2003 Before WIDENER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Millard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpubl
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6673 CHARLES MILLARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ARCANGELO M. TUMINELLI, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-970-8-AW) Submitted: June 25, 2003 Decided: July 15, 2003 Before WIDENER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Millard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpubli..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6673 CHARLES MILLARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ARCANGELO M. TUMINELLI, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-970-8-AW) Submitted: June 25, 2003 Decided: July 15, 2003 Before WIDENER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Millard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Charles Millard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Millard v. Tuminelli, No. CA-03-970-8-AW (D. Md. Apr. 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
