Filed: Oct. 08, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6893 WADGY CHARIF, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP); FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION-PETERSBURG; HARRELL WATTS; HARLEY G. LAPPIN; JOSEPH BROOKS; C. MENDOZA; J. ALLEN; S. SHAH; E. PANAGUITON; J. FAJARDO; E. SORIO; CATHY MCCULLAN; YOLANDA VASQUEZ; MR. BRODIE; TERRY D. WRIGHT; MR. PRICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6893 WADGY CHARIF, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP); FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION-PETERSBURG; HARRELL WATTS; HARLEY G. LAPPIN; JOSEPH BROOKS; C. MENDOZA; J. ALLEN; S. SHAH; E. PANAGUITON; J. FAJARDO; E. SORIO; CATHY MCCULLAN; YOLANDA VASQUEZ; MR. BRODIE; TERRY D. WRIGHT; MR. PRICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the E..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6893
WADGY CHARIF,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP); FEDERAL
CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL
INSTITUTION-PETERSBURG; HARRELL WATTS; HARLEY
G. LAPPIN; JOSEPH BROOKS; C. MENDOZA; J.
ALLEN; S. SHAH; E. PANAGUITON; J. FAJARDO; E.
SORIO; CATHY MCCULLAN; YOLANDA VASQUEZ; MR.
BRODIE; TERRY D. WRIGHT; MR. PRICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-03-265-AM)
Submitted: September 30, 2003 Decided: October 8, 2003
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wadgy Charif, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Wadgy Charif appeals the district court’s orders dismissing
his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), for failure to
state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). Charif also
appeals the court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Charif v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons,
No. CA-03-265-AM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 7, 2003 & entered Apr. 8,
2003; filed May 12, 2003 & entered May 13, 2003). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2