Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Abdul-Khabir v. Cherry, 03-7172 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-7172 Visitors: 36
Filed: Nov. 18, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7172 KHIDR ABDUL-KHABIR, a/k/a Quincy Davis, Plaintiff - Appellant, and WILLIE CONNOR, III, Plaintiff, versus ROY W. CHERRY, Superintendent; L. LATHAM, Lieutenant; J. O’NEIL, Holds Disciplinary Hearings Delivers Disciplinary Reports; E. JONES; D. STERLING; E. TAYLOR; DAVID L. SIMONS; K. LEE; LITTLEJOHN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jer
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7172 KHIDR ABDUL-KHABIR, a/k/a Quincy Davis, Plaintiff - Appellant, and WILLIE CONNOR, III, Plaintiff, versus ROY W. CHERRY, Superintendent; L. LATHAM, Lieutenant; J. O’NEIL, Holds Disciplinary Hearings Delivers Disciplinary Reports; E. JONES; D. STERLING; E. TAYLOR; DAVID L. SIMONS; K. LEE; LITTLEJOHN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-01-500-2) Submitted: October 29, 2003 Decided: November 18, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Khidr Abdul-Khabir, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Khidr Abdul-Khabir appeals a district court judgment granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing his civil rights complaint. The district court found that insofar as Abdul-Khabir sought monetary damages as a result of due process violations during two prison disciplinary hearings, the Defendants were entitled to qualified immunity. With regard to Abdul-Khabir’s claim for injunctive relief, the court found that expungement of his prison records was not necessary. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Abdul-Khabir v. Cherry, No. CA-01-500-2 (E.D. Va. July 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer