Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Henriquez Parada v. INS, 97-2725 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-2725 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 28, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2725 SANTOS DE JESUS HENRIQUEZ PARADA, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A28-073-338) Submitted: March 18, 2003 Decided: April 28, 2003 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles D. Yates, Rockville, Maryland, for
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2725 SANTOS DE JESUS HENRIQUEZ PARADA, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A28-073-338) Submitted: March 18, 2003 Decided: April 28, 2003 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles D. Yates, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Julia K. Doig, Senior Litigation Counsel, Francesco Isgro, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Santos de Jesus Henriquez Parada seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) decision and order dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s order finding him deportable and denying his application for adjustment of status. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s decision and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review substantially on the reasoning of the Board. See Henriquez Parada v. INS, No. A28-073-338 (B.I.A. Nov. 19, 1997).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED * Because we find that the Board properly found Henriquez Parada to be deportable for failure to show that he applied for and received consent to reenter the United States after his prior deportation, we decline to reach the issue of whether the Board properly found that Henriquez Parada was also deportable on the ground that he lacked a valid immigrant visa. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer