Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sullivan v. United States, 03-2211 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-2211 Visitors: 67
Filed: Feb. 24, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2211 DONALD SULLIVAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; TERRY R. YOUNGBLUTH, Colonel, Individually; JAMES W. DELONY, Colonel, Individually; CHARLES R. ALEXANDER, Colonel, Individually; J. RICHARD KAPKA, Brigadier General, Individually; PETER MADSEN, Brigadier General; JOE N. BALLARD, Lieutenant General, Individually; ROBERT B. FLOWERS, Lieutenant General; ERIC K.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2211 DONALD SULLIVAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; TERRY R. YOUNGBLUTH, Colonel, Individually; JAMES W. DELONY, Colonel, Individually; CHARLES R. ALEXANDER, Colonel, Individually; J. RICHARD KAPKA, Brigadier General, Individually; PETER MADSEN, Brigadier General; JOE N. BALLARD, Lieutenant General, Individually; ROBERT B. FLOWERS, Lieutenant General; ERIC K. SHINESKI, General, Individually, Army Chief of Staff; LOUIS CALDERA, Individually; THOMAS E. WHITE, Honorable, Secretary of the Army; MICKEY SUGG, Individually; JEFF RICHTER, Individually; JIM STERLING, Individually; WAYNE WRIGHT, Individually, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-22-7-F) Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Donald Sullivan appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint seeking declaratory judgment that the United States Army Corps of Engineers does not have jurisdiction over his property pursuant to the Clean Water Act and seeking damages. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sullivan v. United States, No. CA-03-22-7-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer