Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

VA Intl Terminals v. Bryant, 03-2214 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-2214 Visitors: 21
Filed: Jun. 24, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2214 VIRGINIA INTERNATIONAL TERMINALS, INC., Petitioner, versus RICHARD BRYANT; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (BRB 02-0792) Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: June 24, 2004 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opini
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2214 VIRGINIA INTERNATIONAL TERMINALS, INC., Petitioner, versus RICHARD BRYANT; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (BRB 02-0792) Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: June 24, 2004 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. F. Nash Bilisoly, IV, VANDEVENTER BLACK, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Petitioner. Howard M. Radzely, Solicitor of Labor, Donald S. Shire, Associate Solicitor, Mark A. Reinhalter, Counsel for Longshore, Kathleen H. Kim, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Director, OWCP. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Virginia International Terminals, Inc., seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of relief from liability for disability benefit payments pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 908(f) (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Va. Int’l Terminals, Inc. v. Bryant, No. 02-0792 (BRB Aug. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer