UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2412 NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT COLLABORATIVE, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MORTON L. GINSBERG, Defendant - Appellant. No. 04-1060 DAVID F. ALBRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT COLLABORATIVE, Plaintiff - Appellee, and MORTON L. GINSBERG, Defendant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03- 1552-1-AMD) Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: July 22, 2004 Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David F. Albright, ALBRIGHT & GOERTEMILLER, L.L.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Thomas N. Biddison, Paul S. Caiola, GALLAGHER, EVELIUS & JONES, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: In Appeal No. 03-2412, Morton L. Ginsberg appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and granting summary judgment in favor of Neighborhood Development Collaborative (“NDC”) in NDC’s declaratory judgment action. Ginsberg also appeals the court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). In Appeal No. 04-1060, Ginsberg’s attorney, David F. Albright, appeals the district court’s order imposing sanctions against him in the form of a reprimand. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Neighborhood Dev. Collaborative v. Ginsberg, No. CA-03-1552-1-AMD (D. Md. Sept. 2, 2003; Oct. 7, 2003; Nov. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -