Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mills v. Berkeley County Sheriff, 03-2490 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-2490 Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 02, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2490 ELWOOD WAYNE MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; PETE MITCHUM, in his official capacity and individually; RONALD LAWRENCE, in his official capacity and individually; JERRY WRIGHT, in his official capacity and individually; UNKNOWN OFFICERS, of the Berkeley County Sheriff’s Department in their official capacity and individually; COUNTY OF BERKELEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal fr
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2490 ELWOOD WAYNE MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; PETE MITCHUM, in his official capacity and individually; RONALD LAWRENCE, in his official capacity and individually; JERRY WRIGHT, in his official capacity and individually; UNKNOWN OFFICERS, of the Berkeley County Sheriff’s Department in their official capacity and individually; COUNTY OF BERKELEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-01-4494-2-23) Submitted: March 15, 2004 Decided: April 2, 2004 Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elwood Wayne Mills, Appellant Pro Se. James Albert Stuckey, Jr., Robin Lilley Jackson, STUCKEY LAW OFFICES, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Elwood Wayne Mills appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellees’ motion for summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2000) civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mills v. Berkeley County Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-01-4494-2-23 (D.S.C. Oct. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer