Filed: May 21, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2503 STAN LABER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DONALD RUMSFELD, United States Secretary of Defense, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-03-170-A) Submitted: April 30, 2004 Decided: May 21, 2004 Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stan Laber, Ap
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2503 STAN LABER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DONALD RUMSFELD, United States Secretary of Defense, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-03-170-A) Submitted: April 30, 2004 Decided: May 21, 2004 Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stan Laber, App..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2503 STAN LABER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DONALD RUMSFELD, United States Secretary of Defense, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-03-170-A) Submitted: April 30, 2004 Decided: May 21, 2004 Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stan Laber, Appellant Pro Se. Steven E. Gordon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Stan Laber appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgement to the Defendant on Laber’s employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Laber v. Rumsfeld, No. CA-03-170-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
