Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Spencer v. Earley, 03-7037 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-7037 Visitors: 34
Filed: Feb. 23, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Vacated by Supreme Court, December 6, 2004 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7037 MICHEAL LEE SPENCER, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARK EARLEY, Office of the Virginia Attorney General; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Corrections; BRUNSWICK CORRECTIONAL CENTER; OFFICE OF HEALTH SERVICES; ERIC M. MADSEN; RONALD ANGELONE; GENE M. JOHNSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, a
More
Vacated by Supreme Court, December 6, 2004 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7037 MICHEAL LEE SPENCER, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARK EARLEY, Office of the Virginia Attorney General; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Corrections; BRUNSWICK CORRECTIONAL CENTER; OFFICE OF HEALTH SERVICES; ERIC M. MADSEN; RONALD ANGELONE; GENE M. JOHNSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-1578-AM) Submitted: December 24, 2003 Decided: Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Micheal Lee Spencer, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Philip Carlton Hollowell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Michael Eugene Ornoff, ORNOFF & ARNOLD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Micheal Lee Spencer, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying Spencer’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spencer v. Earley, No. CA-01-1578-AM (E.D. Va. filed May 30, 2003 & entered June 2, 2003, filed July 15, 2003 & entered July 17, 2003). We deny Spencer’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer